It's not even a great benchmark for Cinema 4D users. Even if you set aside all the concerns about differing optimization levels, do you use your computer to raytrace all day and nothing else? With an Embree-based raytracing app? If you do not, you should not care about Cinebench results. People treat Cinebench as if it's an authoritative test of how fast your CPU will be at a wide variety of real world tasks, but it just isn't. It measures one very narrow and mostly irrelevant thing: how fast Intel's Embree raytracing library renders exactly one canned scene (supplied as part of the benchmark). I am perfectly willing to say that Cinebench is a horrible benchmark. Otherwise it is a little like complaining that your new racing bike is no good because when you walk it up hill it is no faster than your old mountain bike.Ĭlick to expand.Agreed, but I'll up the ante. Take the time, use some professionals who actually know what they are doing and use an optimized product for both venues, then the results are meaningful. so optimized for intel, not optimized for Apple silicon - whoah that is meaningful - Not, Lakshimash. an example, one clown on macforums claimed that Apple silicon was not as good at running Handbrake because he refused to use the optimized tools via Videotoolbox becuase they were hardware encoder/decoders, but what this clown didn't factor in is that Intel silicon also has embedded hardware encoders/decoders which he allowed to be used. It is one thing to be able to run on apple silicon, it is a completely other thing to be optimized for it. cinebench is simply not optimized for apple silicon, and therefore results are not meaningful, period. Click to expand.No, you just don't get it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |